English
Ω 1-Home Conference Ω 2-Program Ω 3-presenters/speakers Ω 4-Fees Ω 5-Ways to Register Ω 6-Facility and Lodging Ω 7-Travel Information Ω 8-Registration Fax/Mail Form
Español
Ω 1-Página Principal del Congreso - Español Ω 2-Programa Ω 3-Ponentes Ω 4-Cuotas de Inscripción y Alojamiento Ω 5-Formas de Inscripción - Español Ω 6-Lugar de Celebración y Alojamientos Ω 7-Información sobre el viaje Ω 8-Formulario de Inscripción Fax/Correo - Español
Français
Ω 1-page d'accueil du congrès - Français Ω 2-Programme Ω 3-présentateurs Ω 4-Frais Ω 5-Pour l’inscription - Français Ω 6-Services - Français Ω 7-Renseignements généraux de voyage - Français Ω 8-Formulaire d’inscription par télécopie ou par courrier
CULT
DEPARTURE
Carmen
Almendros & José A. Carrobles
Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
ABSTRACT
Many
former cult members perceive themselves to have been psychologically abused
during their cult involvement (Chambers, et al., 1994), as well as adjustment
and psychological difficulties after leaving a cult had been documented by
clinicians, assessing former cult members, and researchers (e.g. Martin et al.,
1992). These negative reports of former cult members are sometimes labeled as
“atrocity tales” (Shupe y Bromley, 1980), and it has been argued that those
evaluations of former cult experiences are negatively biased because either the
influence of contact with cult awareness organizations or method of cult
disaffiliation (e.g. Solomon, 1981; Lewis, 1986). It has also been suggested
that those organizations “imbue former members with demands to report higher
level of psychopathology” (cited from Aronoff et al., 2000) as evidence of their
victimization by coercive mind control practices (Lewis & Bromley, 1987).
This
presentation reviews the literature on cult disaffiliation. Data is provided
according to the perceptions of a Spanish sample of 100 former members of
diverse cultic groups about their cult departure, as well as perceived
psychological abuse and reported levels of psychological distress regarding
method of cult disaffiliation and assistance by cult awareness groups.
Perceived
psychological abuse reported by former members was assessed using the Spanish
version of the Group Psychological Abuse Scale
(Almendros, et al., 2004; Chambers et al., 1994).
Psychological distress of former cult members was assessed employing the Symptom
Checklist 90 – Revised (Derogatis,
1983; González de Rivera, et al., 2002).
Concerning method of departure, the majority of our participants walked away
their groups after personal reflection, without outside assistance, and
considered disillusion as the most important factor for their cult
disaffiliation.
Results
on former member’s perceptions on the psychological abusiveness of their cultic
groups and their levels of psychological distress will be presented regarding
whether or not they had contact with cult education and/or awareness resources
and method of cult departure.
According
to our data, no evidence supports the above mentioned assertion relating contact
with cult-awareness associations or way of exiting with negatively biased
perceptions of former cult experiences.
Almendros, C.,
Carrobles, J.A., Rodríguez-Carballeira, A., Jansà, J.M.
(2004). Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española de la Group
Psychological Abuse Scale para la medida de abuso psicológico en contextos
grupales. Psicothema, 16 (1), 132-138.
Aronoff, J.,
Lynn, S.J., Malinoski, P.
(2000). Are cultic environments psychologically harmful? Clinical Psychology
Review, 20(1), 91-111.
Chambers, W.V., Langone,
M.D., Dole, A.A., & Grice, J.W.
(1994). The Group Psychological Abuse scale: a measure of the varieties of
cultic abuse. Cultic Studies Journal, 11(1), 88-117.
Derogatis, L. R.
(1983).
SCL-90-R.
Administration,
Scoring and Procedures Manual II for the Revised Version of the SCL-90.
Baltimore: John
Hopkins University Press.
González de
Rivera, J. L. y cols.
(2002). SCL-90-R. Cuestionario de 90 síntomas.
Manual. Publicaciones de
Psicología Aplicada. TEA Ediciones. Madrid.
Lewis, J.R.
(1986). Reconstructing the cult experience: Post-involvement attitudes as a
function of mode of exit and post-involvement socialization. Sociological
Analysis, 46, 151-159.
Lewis, J.R. & Bromley, D.
(1987). The cult withdrawal syndrome: A case of misattribution of cause? Journal
for the Scientific Study of Religion, 26, 508-522.
Martin, P.R., Langone, M.D.,
Dole, A.A., & Wiltrout, J.
(1992). Post-cult symptoms as measured by the MCMI before and after residential
treatment. Cultic Studies Journal, 9(2), 219-250.
Shupe, A.D. & Bromley, D.G.
(1980). The New Vigilantes. Deprogrammers, Anticultists and the New Religions.
Beverly Hills: Sage.
Solomon, T.
(1981). Integrating the
'Moonie' experience: A survey of ex-members of the Unification Church. In T.
Robbins & D. Anthony (Eds.), In gods we trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
|